Bruce Force has had an interesting idea how to encode strings. The following is the description of how the encoding is done:
Let x1,x2,...,xn be the sequence of characters of the string to be encoded.
1. Choose an integer m and n pairwise distinct numbers p1,p2,...,pn from the set {1, 2, ..., n} (a permutation of the numbers 1 to n).
2. Repeat the following step m times.
3. For 1 ≤ i ≤ n set yi to xpi, and then for 1 ≤ i ≤ n replace xi by yi.
For example, when we want to encode the string "hello", and we choose the value m = 3 and the permutation 2, 3, 1, 5, 4, the data would be encoded in 3 steps: "hello" -> "elhol" -> "lhelo" -> "helol".
Bruce gives you the encoded strings, and the numbers m and p1, ..., pn used to encode these strings. He claims that because he used huge numbers m for encoding, you will need a lot of time to decode the strings. Can you disprove this claim by quickly decoding the strings?